Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 13, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@HaydarAk
Copy link

No description provided.

@HaydarAk HaydarAk added enhancement ticket proposing an improvement, extension of exisitng or new features breaking change Issue indicating that the changes proposed are not backwards compatible. labels Jun 30, 2021
@HaydarAk HaydarAk requested a review from JohannesLipp June 30, 2021 13:22
@HaydarAk HaydarAk marked this pull request as ready for review July 1, 2021 08:10
Copy link
Member

@JohannesLipp JohannesLipp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix the small changes, thanks!

rdfs:domain ids:App ;
rdfs:range xsd:string ;
rdfs:label "app documentation"@en ;
rdfs:comment "text documentation of the data app"@en ;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"of an app". Please also update for the following properties in this file.


ids:AppType
a owl:Class;
rdfs:label "Data app type"@en ;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please remove the term "data" from both label and comment.

Copy link
Member

@clange clange left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks largely good, but I'd like to request two small changes.

a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
rdfs:domain ids:App ;
rdfs:range xsd:anyURI ;
rdfs:label "api container spec reference"@en ;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"api container": should this read "API container", or (as the names of properties and classes suggest) "app container"?

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@clange This should be "app container spec reference" at this point

rdfs:comment "Type of an app endpoint. Data apps have different endpoint types, e.g., for input, output or health status."@en ;
.

ids:appEndpointPort
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Am I getting it right that this and other properties will be deleted? If so, please document it in the change log. I think it would make sense to draft these parts of the changelog now already, in a section "next release", as we do not yet know the version number.

Copy link
Collaborator

@DErCouch DErCouch left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I see a lot of naming changes within the PR. Maybe rethink the intention about renaming "Data App" to "App". As "Data App" is the logical parent for "Smart-Data-App", "System-Adapter" and "Orchestration-App" the current naming is following a indirect naming convention.

a owl:DatatypeProperty ;
rdfs:domain ids:App ;
rdfs:range xsd:anyURI ;
rdfs:label "api container spec reference"@en ;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@clange This should be "app container spec reference" at this point

@JohannesLipp
Copy link
Member

Update notes: @chquix and @ahemaid will discuss this PR's relevance and decide on its further handling.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

breaking change Issue indicating that the changes proposed are not backwards compatible. enhancement ticket proposing an improvement, extension of exisitng or new features

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants